A possible answer to one of my questions:-) Ivan Herman wrote: > > ----- OWL-R ----- > > > Also, I also do not understand why the following is true: > > "Compared with DL Lite, OWL-R works better when you have already > massaged your data into RDF and are working with it as RDF." > Did you mean to say that OWL-R works well in the sense that one uses RDF + OWL-R and can use SPARQL to query the result, whereas this is not really the case for DL Lite? As the statement is true for OWL-R, if this is not the case for SPARQL (ie, query rewriting cannot be done for SPARQL queries easily) than you are right. This is a differentiating feature... Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:30:22 GMT