Re: "Specification" now live in wiki (was Re: managing the documents as wiki pages)

Hi Sandro,

I'm still missing some of the pictures...

-Rinke

Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> I think that it is "ready for prime time", i.e., that we can use this
>>> mechanism to transition the documents for real, and start editing.
>> Agreed. Let's do it.
> 
> Okay, done.    I moved the issues over to the talk page.
> 
> Can you tell me what that page should really be named in the wiki, and
> what the other documents should be named in the wiki?
> 
> The OWL 1.1 site has:
>   <dt><a href="overview.html">Overview</a></dt>
>   <dt><a href="owl_specification.html">Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax</a></dt>
>   <dt><a href="metamodel.html">MOF-Based Metamodel</a></dt>
>   <dt><a href="semantics.html">Model-Theoretic Semantics</a></dt>
> 
>   <dt><a href="xml_syntax.html">XML Syntax</a></dt>
>   <dt><a href="rdf_mapping.html">Mapping to RDF Graphs</a></dt>
>   <dt><a href="tractable.html">Tractable Fragments</a></dt>
> 
> which is where I got "Specification" as the short name, but I'd love
> something which conveys more information.  I guess the term "Abstract
> Syntax" is being frowned upon now?  Maybe "Syntactic Structures"?
> 
> (it's not hard to change later, but if y'all know now, that'd be cool.)
> 
>       -- Sandro

-- 
----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: hoekstra@uva.nl   Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499    Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,         Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,           PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,            The Netherlands
----------------------------------------------