W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Serialization issues

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:19:43 +0100
Message-Id: <980AF626-283A-42E8-84FC-3F6FBF6B259D@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, hoekstra@uva.nl, alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>> How far do you want to carry this trend?  Should we define a  
>> canonical
>> order for the serialization of ontolgoies?
>
> Yep. Lexicographical would be smart. That's what some serializers  
> do anyway.
[snip]

Sorry, that's a bit unclear, I meant lexicographical within each  
section.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 10:20:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT