W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

structural specification of ontology imports

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:41:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20071026.094145.27480576.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Serialization issues
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:16:27 +0100

> On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

[...]

> > By the way, it appears that the UML diagram for ontologies is not  
> > quite
> > right.  Shouldn't the imports of an ontology be ontology names, not
> > ontologies?
> 
>  From a specing api point of view, I would think that the former is  
> correct.

Doesn't this cause complicaitons/problems with ontologies that include
themselves?

> Cheers,
> Bijan.

peter
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 13:50:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT