Re: (resolution status/documents)Re: minutes for 17 October

understood.
-Alan

On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Jim Hendler wrote:

> yes, you're right Alan, i apologize on that point - note though  
> that the heartbeat allows publication of less than these whole  
> documents (for example we could publish only those features for  
> which there was strong agreement) or other such things -so my main  
> point, that I think it is still too early for such a resolution to  
> make sense,  stands
>   -JH
>
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>>
>> Minor point of clarification: Resolution says we will publish 2 of  
>> those documents, and possibly a third. Also, the date is pretty  
>> much a W3C mandate, though the selection of documents, of course,  
>> isn't.
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Jim Hendler wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, I'm not opposed to a decision that we consider moving the  
>>> documents forward - but the way the resolution is written it says  
>>> we WILL move THESE three documents forward BY A CERTAIN DATE - I  
>>> would like to believe we will work on understanding these  
>>> documents, making sure we have consensus on the key issues, and  
>>> publishing as ready.
>>
>>
>
> "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research,  
> would it?." - Albert Einstein
>
> Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
> Tetherless World Constellation Chair
> Computer Science Dept
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 19 October 2007 17:34:26 UTC