W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:40:38 +0000
Message-Id: <33E56811-3512-4F17-952A-692C4762AD3C@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
You're right -- out of scope is not the right reason. I am happy to  
postpone it on the grounds that we don't know how to do it -- or  
perhaps more precisely on the grounds that implementors are unwilling  
and/or unable to support it.

Ian


On 2 Dec 2007, at 18:20, Jim Hendler wrote:

> I'm happy to support closing this as postpoint,but I would have a  
> problem agreeing that it is out of scope - if we had a working  
> mechanism we would certainly be allowed to add it.  I'd suggest  
> postponing it because we don't know how to do it.
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
>
>>
>> Does anyone want to champion this issue?
>>
>> If not, then I am inclined to close it as Postponed on the grounds  
>> of being out of scope.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>
> "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research,  
> would it?." - Albert Einstein
>
> Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
> Tetherless World Constellation Chair
> Computer Science Dept
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2007 19:40:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:29 GMT