W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: new topic: Should Closed World Assumption(CWA) and Open World Assumption(OWA) be integrated?

From: duanyucong <duanyucong@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 04:51:38 +0800
Message-ID: <SNT132-W3405EB7871015EDF17CF4D82D0@phx.gbl>
To: <pascal.hitzler@wright.edu>
CC: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>

> "Local Closed World" (LCW) simply stands for a combination of OWA and
> CWA. It means that a language has both capabilities (i.e., represent
> some things under OWA, some things under CWA). You mean that you packaged CWA and OWA in a language. It is feasible. Can i know more on what you mean by "language"? Thanks! 
> 
> Pascal.
> 
> On 8/20/2011 3:28 AM, duanyucong wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Pascal, Thanks for your reply. I will try to find the
> > literature. Please permit me to explore a little bit here.May i know
> > what does "Local Closed World Semantics" mean? Is it different from
> > CWA? How?and why? Thanks for your reply. Best regards, Yucong btw: my
> > email: duanyucong@hotmail.com
> >> To: duanyucong@hotmail.com CC: public-owl-dev@w3.org
> >> 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Prof. Dr. Pascal Hitzler
> Dept. of Computer Science, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
> pascal@pascal-hitzler.de   http://www.knoesis.org/pascal/
> Semantic Web Textbook: http://www.semantic-web-book.org
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
> 
 		 	   		  
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2011 20:52:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:59 GMT