If we're gathering links: http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=description+logic+uml&btnG=Search http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=franconi+ICOM&btnG=Search&hl=en http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=uml+owl&btnG=Search&hl=en None of this, of course, shows that the UML-OWL one isn't novel in some sense. Who knows? Personally, I wouldn't be thrilled with a patent for a relatively trivial variant. But would I be happier with a patent on a variant that captured the semantics in a substantially better way? Can you patent a mapping? (That just seems like a mathematical function...) Cheers, Bijan.Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 14:24:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:00 GMT