W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Annotation objects

From: Denny Vrandecic <dvr@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:05 +0100
Message-ID: <45E5A3F9.3090207@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
To: Matthew Horridge <matthew.horridge@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: public-owl-dev@w3.org

This is an open bug, and already listed on
<http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/bug_list.html>

It was raised about four months ago.
But obviously no one took care of it. :P

What needs to be done to get this resolved?

cheers,
denny

Matthew Horridge wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any reason why the objects of annotations are restricted to 
> being constants (or individuals)?  Could the spec be relaxed to allow 
> any type of entity as the object of an annotation for example classes or 
> properties?
> (Figure 6 in section 4.4 needs updating - at least to reflect the fact 
> that an individual can be the object of an annotation as specified in 
> the bug list).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Matthew
> 
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 15:48:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:54 GMT