- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:13:20 +0100
- To: "Adrian Walker" <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On 26 Jun 2007, at 13:31, Adrian Walker wrote: > Hi Bijan -- > > You wrote... > >> ...I'm having trouble >> finding examples and projects using LP or specifically F-Logic in the >> way and at the scale we see for OWL. > > The IBL system [1] uses rules that are interpreted to extract a > highly declarative meaning [2]. There are online examples of > reasoning over OWL/RDF triples, and also over n-ary relations. For > scalability the triples or other relations can be in a SQL database > [3,4] (and when the SPARQL spec is finalized and implemented > probably in SPARQL too) . > > HTH . Nope. And you must have misunderstood me as not only have I've seen this spiel about a million times, nearly verbatim, but it is not remotely apropos. If I read your oil example correctly (*again*) it's just a toy example. A few rules, then a database. And it's not even a real effort or a large effort or a collaborative effort. The rest of your public examples are similar, as I recall. So these are no help at all. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 14:12:25 UTC