- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:20:06 -0400
- To: "Boris Motik" <bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>, "'chris mungall'" <cjm@fruitfly.org>
On Apr 18, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Boris Motik wrote: > 1. One should provide an RDF encoding that does not break up > equivalences; > then, we might tack on the annotations appropriately. equivalences are not the only case. > 2. A hack would be to simply repeat the axiom annotation on each > generated > equivalence. I am not particularly fond of this, but it is a > possibility. A third would be to add another level of indirection. _:x rdf:type owl11:AxiomPart _:x rdf:subject s _:x rdf:predicate p _:x rdf:object o _:y rdf:type owl11:Axiom _:y owl11:hasAxiomPart _:x ... _:y T(apIDi) T(cti) 1 ? i ? n -Alan
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 13:21:11 UTC