Re: Axiom annotations

On Apr 18, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> On Apr 18, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Boris Motik wrote:
>> 1. One should provide an RDF encoding that does not break up  
>> equivalences;
>> then, we might tack on the annotations appropriately.
>
> equivalences are not the only case.
>
>> 2. A hack would be to simply repeat the axiom annotation on each  
>> generated
>> equivalence. I am not particularly fond of this, but it is a  
>> possibility.
>
> A third would be to add another level of indirection.

Ah yes, I forgot about the Drew trick:
	<http://www.cs.yale.edu/~ddj/papers/ISWC02.pdf>

Also used in OWL-S.

Can we kill ourselves now?

Cheers,
Bijan.