W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Axiom annotations

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:26:53 +0100
Message-Id: <EE54F2C3-5D15-4DA0-AB24-DCDD213A4877@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Boris Motik" <bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk>, <public-owl-dev@w3.org>, "'chris mungall'" <cjm@fruitfly.org>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>

On Apr 18, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> On Apr 18, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Boris Motik wrote:
>> 1. One should provide an RDF encoding that does not break up  
>> equivalences;
>> then, we might tack on the annotations appropriately.
>
> equivalences are not the only case.
>
>> 2. A hack would be to simply repeat the axiom annotation on each  
>> generated
>> equivalence. I am not particularly fond of this, but it is a  
>> possibility.
>
> A third would be to add another level of indirection.

Ah yes, I forgot about the Drew trick:
	<http://www.cs.yale.edu/~ddj/papers/ISWC02.pdf>

Also used in OWL-S.

Can we kill ourselves now?

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 13:27:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:54 GMT