Re: OWL1.1 APis

On 20 Dec 2006, at 22:53, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> (Of course, OWL-DL facts are not closed under negation, i.e., you  
> cannot just negate an arbitrary fact.)

This was my point.

> I guess my new new years resolution should be never to make a (even  
> true!) unguarded/qualified statement :) (er...*EXCEPT* where, by a  
> sort of "closed world" (closed mind? :)) assumption, I know  
> everyone *really will* get the context and respect it accordingly :)).

I know, I know: I have been a bastard on purpose :-)

--e.