On Dec 20, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote: > > On 20 Dec 2006, at 22:53, Bijan Parsia wrote: > >> (Of course, OWL-DL facts are not closed under negation, i.e., you >> cannot just negate an arbitrary fact.) > > This was my point. But not what you *said* :) """Also in OWL-DL there is no negation in statements.""" Burn! >> I guess my new new years resolution should be never to make a >> (even true!) unguarded/qualified statement :) (er...*EXCEPT* >> where, by a sort of "closed world" (closed mind? :)) assumption, I >> know everyone *really will* get the context and respect it >> accordingly :)). > > I know, I know: I have been a bastard on purpose :-) Meet this thing that is hoisting you. It is your petard :) Cheers, Bijan.Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 13:29:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:14 UTC