Re: OWL1.1 APis

On Dec 20, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:

>
> On 20 Dec 2006, at 22:53, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
>> (Of course, OWL-DL facts are not closed under negation, i.e., you  
>> cannot just negate an arbitrary fact.)
>
> This was my point.

But not what you *said* :)

"""Also in OWL-DL there is no negation in statements."""

Burn!

>> I guess my new new years resolution should be never to make a  
>> (even true!) unguarded/qualified statement :) (er...*EXCEPT*  
>> where, by a sort of "closed world" (closed mind? :)) assumption, I  
>> know everyone *really will* get the context and respect it  
>> accordingly :)).
>
> I know, I know: I have been a bastard on purpose :-)

Meet this thing that is hoisting you. It is your petard :)

Cheers,
Bijan.