Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough

After a number of discussions with Bijan Parsia,
I agree that the relation of Natural Language concepts
and OWL 2 Classes is too complex to be included
in the OWL 2 primer.

I hope that this topic will be addressed in other OWL 2
documents.

Dick McCullough
http://mkrmke.org

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <rhm@pioneerca.com>
Cc: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:32 AM
Subject: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough


> Dear Richard,
>
> Thank you for your comment
> 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009May/0020.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> The Working Group feels that your proposed changes will only serve to
> confuse readers of its documents and so deems them unsuitable for
> inclusion in its documents.
>
> Therefore, the Working Group will not be making any further changes to
> its documents in response to your comment.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
>

Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 13:19:09 UTC