Re: Web standards, Openness and Transparency

On August 12, 2014 at 2:44:09 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.barstow@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 8/12/14 1:23 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > [speaking about "open w3c"...] we probably need to drag in the W3C team people trying  
> to sort this out (I think that's PLH). It would be great to get a status update on where all  
> this is at. I'm worried that we might be doing duplicate work here by even discussing this  
> stuff.
>  
> As a reminder, earlier I mentioned this general "/TR graveyard" issue is
> now captured as [Issue-106] for the W3Process group and I still think
> that group is the best venue to discuss it, and I think Consortium staff
> are members of that group.
>  
> I don't know if that group has agreed on a `priority` for Issue-106 but
> if you or anyone else considers it a high priority, then please send a
> related e-mail to public-w3process and include the literal "issue-106"
> in the Subject or Body of the email (this will make sure that group's
> issue tracker automagically includes your email in the issue's `paper
> trail`).

Ok, before we do that tho, it might be good just to get an update from the W3C. I talked to Jeff on the phone recently and he assured me that the W3C staff had already done a bunch of work to make this happen. I don't want to file more bugs, etc. if PLH, Robin, etc. are close to being done.

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 18:47:26 UTC