Re: Web standards, Openness and Transparency

Indeed.  I spoke with Ian Jacobs about this a week or two ago, and they are
working on it, announcing soon I believe.
On Aug 12, 2014 11:47 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On August 12, 2014 at 2:44:09 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.barstow@gmail.com)
> wrote:
> > On 8/12/14 1:23 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > > [speaking about "open w3c"...] we probably need to drag in the W3C
> team people trying
> > to sort this out (I think that's PLH). It would be great to get a status
> update on where all
> > this is at. I'm worried that we might be doing duplicate work here by
> even discussing this
> > stuff.
> >
> > As a reminder, earlier I mentioned this general "/TR graveyard" issue is
> > now captured as [Issue-106] for the W3Process group and I still think
> > that group is the best venue to discuss it, and I think Consortium staff
> > are members of that group.
> >
> > I don't know if that group has agreed on a `priority` for Issue-106 but
> > if you or anyone else considers it a high priority, then please send a
> > related e-mail to public-w3process and include the literal "issue-106"
> > in the Subject or Body of the email (this will make sure that group's
> > issue tracker automagically includes your email in the issue's `paper
> > trail`).
>
> Ok, before we do that tho, it might be good just to get an update from the
> W3C. I talked to Jeff on the phone recently and he assured me that the W3C
> staff had already done a bunch of work to make this happen. I don't want to
> file more bugs, etc. if PLH, Robin, etc. are close to being done.
>
>