W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Pattern for annotation on regions or objects?

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:12:29 -0400
Message-ID: <5408AB8D.5020702@w3.org>
To: vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com, 'public-openannotation' <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi, Vladimir–

I do have a rough proposal for describing the selection of a shape 
within a geometric or geographic area, call "annoshapes" [1].

It would not deal with the case of different photographs of the same 
painting (which I think is a Hard Problem), but it does address having a 
unified viewport and coordinate system within that viewport.

[1] http://shepazu.github.io/annoshape/annoshape.html

Regards-
-Doug


On 9/4/14 8:01 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
> Nobody has yet mentioned that you need to describe how the image was
> taken from the object, and bind it geometrically. - Painting images
> often have different flags or aspects, e.g. recto/verso,
> framed/unframed, detail; visible-light/xray, etc. E.g. see
> https://confluence.ontotext.com/display/ResearchSpace/Yale+Mapping+Problems#YaleMappingProblems-ImageViews
>
>
- But this just touches the tip of the iceberg.
> Consider that for 3D objects that'd be a lot more complex (going into
> the subject matter of standards like VRML and X3D)
>
> CIDOC CRM has a way of describing locations on objects: E46 Section
> Definition. E.g. see: -
> http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm/entity_list_cleaned.html#E46_Section_Definition
>
>
- http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-graphical/#location 2
> - http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-tutorial/#slide41
> Unfortunately there's no standardization of expressing coordinate
> systems or coordinates for section definitions.
>
> But I think it should mesh with E54 Dimensions. E.g. "the origin of
> this image is 5cm along the Width dimension, and 10 cm along the
> Height dimension". -
> http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm/entity_list_cleaned.html#E54_Dimension
>
>
- http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-graphical/#measurement
> - http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-tutorial/#slide30
>
> Also, it'd be good to record details of the image taking
> (digitization) process. There's an extension CRMdig dedicated to
> that. E.g. there's crmdig:D11_Digital_Measurement_Event
>
> I think the right workflow is: - take images of objects - record the
> geometric binding (E46 Section Definition) and provenance of the
> digitization process (CRMdig) - annotate images (since many people
> can't touch the real objects, and there are few tools to annotate the
> real object) - infer that the same annotations apply to the object
> (section) - be able to query for annotations within a certain object
> region, coming from different images.
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 18:12:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:06 UTC