- From: Simone Fonda <fonda@netseven.it>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:05:01 +0100
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > First, we hope that you've all had a safe and happy holidays! Hey Robert! Thanks a lot and my best wishes for a great 2014 to you and to the whole list. > Please let us know your thoughts on this idea! While we think that a formal > TR will carry significantly more weight than the current community draft, > especially with larger industrial potential adopters, and that a broader > scope of work can strengthen the market, we want to make sure you agree that > the creation of a WG is the right thing to do at this stage. Do you think > this is the right step? Would you be interested in participating in this > proposed WG? Please give us your comments here! We are VERY interested in participating in this!! Not entirely sure, but i believe the little company i work for is not interested in becoming a member of W3C, i think the "invited expert" workaround would be more than enough. I'll do the best i can to pretend and behave like an expert! ;) Tho i've heard of a possible membership obtained through European Projects, i'll investigate a bit better. A couple of serious questions: what kind of effort (time-wise) do you think this would require? How many "face to face" meetings does the average WG have per year, and where? Would one person from an organisation/project be enough or do you recommend a couple or even more? Last but not least... where do i need to sign up? :)) Best, Simone
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:06:02 UTC