W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Last Ultimate Final Call :)

From: Leyla Jael García Castro <leylajael@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:37:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CACLxDV7VimRr82MfndAPjHqr9RpAnQ8Nrm83QFKocEoBX9hLsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Stian, all,



On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> I agree that we can't risk just minting #tag URIs in someone elses
> namespace to try to work around the HTTP Range 14 problem.
>
> It would have to be some very unique tag so we know it's "ours" - like
> #ff3f6942-dc0d-484f-becb-b6eea4a1d6b3 - which would just be silly.
>
> I also of course agree that you "should not do that" - return a
> document for a "non-informational resource", but sadly the real world
> is our domain, and there is no specification now that mandates
> resources for "real world things/concepts" to NOT present
> representations. In fact it is core to the HTTP architecture that the
> Representation is distinct from the Resource.
>
> So - for your suggestion below:
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > <anno1> a oa:Annotation ;
> >   oa:hasBody <tagSpRes1> ;
> >   oa:hasTarget <target1> .
> >
> > <tagSpRes1> a oa:SpecificResource , oa:[Semantic]Tag ;
> >   oa:hasSource <http://omim.org/entry/104760> ;
>
> This is a beautiful solution.
>
> So am I right in assuming that you are suggesting that
> oa:[Semantic]Tag is a subclass of oa:SpecificResource  (we would
> always use this pattern for semantic tagging), not just a suggested
> "rescue" pattern where you can't put http://omim.org/entry/104760
> directly in oa:hasBody because it is (could be) a retrievable
> document?
>

I am confused now, again :-( I understood that oa:[SemanticTag] would be
similar to oa:Tag and both could be applied for either resources or
specific resources. I do not see why it would be a subclass of
oa:SpecificResource.

Cheers,

Leyla

>
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
>
>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 10:38:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC