W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > November 2012

Re: F2F Decision: Provenance

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:08:33 +0100
Message-ID: <50927451.9010704@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-openannotation@w3.org>
'oa:serializedBy' sounds good to me!
I'd just remind you to update the 'Generating' Activity on the top. From your explanation, I suppose it could be quite safely renamed as 'Serializing'.

Antoine


> After staring a the chart a little more I also agree that is confusing.
>
> The current definition of 'oa:generatedBy' is: The object of the relationship is the agent, likely software, responsible for generating the serialization of the Annotation's graph
>
> So, how about 'oa:serializedBy'?
>
> Paolo
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I guess the lack of reaction means everyone agrees :-)
>
>     I may have trouble the very idea of representing oa:Annotation as direct result of the generating, as opposed to the direct result of annotating. But I'll clearly need some more time to get my head around it.
>
>     One trivial for now is replacing oa:generator with oa:generatedBy.
>     This makes the property seem very close to prov:wasGeneratedBy, in a context where OA and PROV would be used together. While they are quite different in reality: range of oa:generatedBy would be agent, range of prov:wasGeneratedBy is prov:Activity.
>
>     Antoine
>
>
>
>         This part of the discussion covered two primary topics related to
>         provenance and the W3C Provenance Ontology.
>
>         1. Can we replace oa:equivalent with something from the Prov work?
>
>         Decision: Yes, prov:alternateOf is semantically identical to oa:equivalent
>         Thus we'll simply replace all mentions of oa:equivalent in the
>         specification with prov:alternateOf
>
>         2. What is the relationship between the current (simple) provenance
>         information recorded for an annotation, and the Prov work?
>
>         Decisions:
>         - Replace oa:generated with prov:generatedAt, as they are
>         semantically identical
>         - Replace oa:generator with oa:generatedBy, and subclass of
>         prov:wasAttributedTo
>         - Replace oa:annotated with oa:annotatedAt (to follow the generatedAt pattern)
>         - Replace oa:annotator with oa:annotatedBy
>         - Include a diagram of the mapping in the specification
>
>         (Diagram attached)
>
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Rob& Paolo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> http://www.paolociccarese.info/
> Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
> Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
> +1-857-366-1524 (mobile) +1-617-768-8744 (office)
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s), may contain information that is considered
> to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to any other party without the permission of the sender.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
>
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 13:09:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 November 2012 13:09:02 GMT