W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > November 2012

Re: F2F Decision: Provenance

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:20:36 -0600
Message-ID: <CABevsUEOP-mAAgHuLN0g5QWJwJ=_w94GSVoqP0_n5zdQWBh13A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
serializedBy / Serializing is fine by me.

Rob


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> 'oa:serializedBy' sounds good to me!
> I'd just remind you to update the 'Generating' Activity on the top. From
> your explanation, I suppose it could be quite safely renamed as
> 'Serializing'.
>
> Antoine
>
>
>  After staring a the chart a little more I also agree that is confusing.
>>
>> The current definition of 'oa:generatedBy' is: The object of the
>> relationship is the agent, likely software, responsible for generating the
>> serialization of the Annotation's graph
>>
>> So, how about 'oa:serializedBy'?
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:
>> aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     I guess the lack of reaction means everyone agrees :-)
>>
>>     I may have trouble the very idea of representing oa:Annotation as
>> direct result of the generating, as opposed to the direct result of
>> annotating. But I'll clearly need some more time to get my head around it.
>>
>>     One trivial for now is replacing oa:generator with oa:generatedBy.
>>     This makes the property seem very close to prov:wasGeneratedBy, in a
>> context where OA and PROV would be used together. While they are quite
>> different in reality: range of oa:generatedBy would be agent, range of
>> prov:wasGeneratedBy is prov:Activity.
>>
>>     Antoine
>>
>>
>>
>>         This part of the discussion covered two primary topics related to
>>         provenance and the W3C Provenance Ontology.
>>
>>         1. Can we replace oa:equivalent with something from the Prov work?
>>
>>         Decision: Yes, prov:alternateOf is semantically identical to
>> oa:equivalent
>>         Thus we'll simply replace all mentions of oa:equivalent in the
>>         specification with prov:alternateOf
>>
>>         2. What is the relationship between the current (simple)
>> provenance
>>         information recorded for an annotation, and the Prov work?
>>
>>         Decisions:
>>         - Replace oa:generated with prov:generatedAt, as they are
>>         semantically identical
>>         - Replace oa:generator with oa:generatedBy, and subclass of
>>         prov:wasAttributedTo
>>         - Replace oa:annotated with oa:annotatedAt (to follow the
>> generatedAt pattern)
>>         - Replace oa:annotator with oa:annotatedBy
>>         - Include a diagram of the mapping in the specification
>>
>>         (Diagram attached)
>>
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>
>>         Rob& Paolo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
>> http://www.paolociccarese.**info/ <http://www.paolociccarese.info/>
>> Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
>> Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
>> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
>> +1-857-366-1524 (mobile) +1-617-768-8744 (office)
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the
>> addressee(s), may contain information that is considered
>> to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
>> any other party without the permission of the sender.
>> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:21:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:21:05 GMT