- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:44:52 +0200
- To: public-odrl@w3.org
This is the choice I like. I have no strong reasons, but this choice seems to favour having a name in http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/, http://prefix.cc or schema.org... Víctor El 31/07/2013 6:10, Renato Iannella escribió: > I would like to propose a single/flat namespace for the ODRL Ontology. > > The benefits are that it would be simpler to use/remember and would then be consistent with industry practice (like schema.org, where we would like to propose our semantics to in the future). > > The future evolution/versioning of the ontology will be thru the semantics of owl/skos and not by changing the URI each time. > > Does anyone object to this? > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 08:45:17 UTC