Re: Namespace of ODRL

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>wrote:

> I would like to propose a single/flat namespace for the ODRL Ontology.
>
> The benefits are that it would be simpler to use/remember and would then
> be consistent with industry practice (like schema.org, where we would
> like to propose our semantics to in the future).
>

+1 for a single namespace. Having multiple namespaces is quite error prone
as Stuart already mentioned.

Best Regards,
Nandana