W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > November 2012

Re: News industry requirement: action "license"

From: <cindy.lewis@me.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:26:41 -0500
Cc: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
Message-id: <E8FB4E23-36EA-4F1D-93FA-A51FEA2CF74F@me.com>
To: Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com>
Hi Ray,

Thanks for sharing this slide deck. I'm sorry I missed it earlier today.

We're going to have to deal with license expression sooner or later. Now I see the value in starting with a smaller use case. Let me think about this some more.

Cindy

On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com> wrote:

> Hi Cindy,
> 
> We essentially mapped PLUS onto ODRL 1.1 [1] and found that a complete and generic profile would be possible, but quite an undertaking.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.slideshare.net/rgauss/rightspro-odrl-plus
> 
> 
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 15 Nov 2012, at 14:49, cindy.lewis@me.com wrote:
>> 
>>> I do not know what the politics are, but what about using the PLUS Licensing Glossary to help us express licenses? It's fairly robust.
>> 
>> Cindy, we did start a mapping process [1].
>> The issue was that PLUS focusses more on the constraints, rather than a broad set of actions (for permissions).
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers...
>> Renato Iannella
>> Semantic Identity
>> http://semanticidentity.com
>> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>> 
>> [1] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=PLUSProfile
> 
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 05:27:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 November 2012 05:27:18 GMT