- From: <cindy.lewis@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:26:41 -0500
- To: Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
Hi Ray, Thanks for sharing this slide deck. I'm sorry I missed it earlier today. We're going to have to deal with license expression sooner or later. Now I see the value in starting with a smaller use case. Let me think about this some more. Cindy On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com> wrote: > Hi Cindy, > > We essentially mapped PLUS onto ODRL 1.1 [1] and found that a complete and generic profile would be possible, but quite an undertaking. > > Regards, > > Ray > > > [1] http://www.slideshare.net/rgauss/rightspro-odrl-plus > > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote: > >> >> On 15 Nov 2012, at 14:49, cindy.lewis@me.com wrote: >> >>> I do not know what the politics are, but what about using the PLUS Licensing Glossary to help us express licenses? It's fairly robust. >> >> Cindy, we did start a mapping process [1]. >> The issue was that PLUS focusses more on the constraints, rather than a broad set of actions (for permissions). >> >> >> Cheers... >> Renato Iannella >> Semantic Identity >> http://semanticidentity.com >> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 >> >> [1] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=PLUSProfile >
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 05:27:17 UTC