W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > November 2012

Re: News industry requirement: action "license"

From: Cindy Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:14:54 -0500
Message-id: <A722115A-AE82-4830-9290-3F9F340B2D34@me.com>
Cc: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
To: Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com>
May I look at the previous mapping?

Perhaps we could shift our focus from constraints to permissions?

There are compelling reasons to fix it now.

Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Ray Gauss II <ray.gauss@rightspro.com> wrote:

> Hi Cindy,
> 
> We essentially mapped PLUS onto ODRL 1.1 [1] and found that a complete and generic profile would be possible, but quite an undertaking.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.slideshare.net/rgauss/rightspro-odrl-plus
> 
> 
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 15 Nov 2012, at 14:49, cindy.lewis@me.com wrote:
>> 
>>> I do not know what the politics are, but what about using the PLUS Licensing Glossary to help us express licenses? It's fairly robust.
>> 
>> Cindy, we did start a mapping process [1].
>> The issue was that PLUS focusses more on the constraints, rather than a broad set of actions (for permissions).
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers...
>> Renato Iannella
>> Semantic Identity
>> http://semanticidentity.com
>> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>> 
>> [1] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=PLUSProfile
> 
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:15:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:15:39 GMT