W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-native-web-apps@w3.org > December 2011

Re: CFC to start working on splash screen solution

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 02:10:24 +0100
To: public-native-web-apps@w3.org, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
Message-ID: <op.v51mvmg1wxe0ny@widsith-3.local>
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:48:28 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> Apart from a few changes to our Charter (based on Charles' feedback), I  
> think we have consensus on our Charter and can formally start working on  
> technical documents.

Yeah, I don't think we need to delay the start of work on something,
unless it turns out to be controversial.

There is a lot to be said for minimal process which adds restrictions as
they are obviously required - although it helps to have thought about what
will be required before you get there. I was wondering why we need a call
for consensus before this group starts doing stuff... maybe it should be
possible to object, but the default should be "let's get work done" IMHO.
After all, there isn't the kind of patent commitment that Working Groups
have which require up-front agreement...

> So not to delay, this a 1 week Call for Consensus to start working on  
> the Splash Screen as was discussed in [1]. I believe it is a good spec  
> to start working on because it's relatively small, and the use cases and  
> requirements are clear (again, captured mostly in [1] below).

Yeah, go for it...

> As per our Operating Guidelines, to start work we need one (or more)  
> Editor, Prototypist, and a Quality Assurer.
> Looking for volunteers.

At this stage I'm a bit overloaded to be a credible volunteer...



Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
       je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 01:11:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:46:09 UTC