W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

RE: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)

From: Pedro L. Díez Orzas <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:09:55 +0100
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "'Yves Savourel'" <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Cc: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, "'dave lewis'" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "'Clemens Weins'" <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, "'Phil Ritchie'" <philr@vistatec.ie>, "'Ankit Srivastava'" <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, "'Arle Lommel'" <Arle.Lommel@dfki.de>
Message-ID: <0edc01ce145d$3e7a9ca0$bb6fd5e0$@linguaserve.com>
Hi Felix, Yves, all,

Just two things:

1) The Selected usage scenarios "Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4)" is only about WP4, not wp3. I will use a base the presentation in Rome and adapt to Lux (in Roma is the client who present it).

2) About merging agenda, I think Yves is right. We could organize each case from two different points of view, technical and business. For example, for two demos of WP3 and WP4:

TMS-CMS (WP3):
	Technical demo 1: Cocomore
	Technical demo 2: Linguaserve
	Business usage scenario: Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for the Multilingual Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities 

Online Translation System (WP4):
	Technical demo 1: Linguaserve
	Technical demo 2: DCU
	Technical demo 3: Lucy
	Business usage scenario: Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the SpanishTax Agency

... etc

Just my two cents.
Pedro

 ____________________________________


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Enviado el: martes, 26 de febrero de 2013 18:08
Para: Yves Savourel
CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'dave lewis'; 'Clemens Weins'; "''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''"; 'Phil Ritchie'; 'Ankit Srivastava'; 'Arle Lommel'
Asunto: Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)

Am 26.02.13 18:03, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>> These two
>> [
>> •  Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the 
>> SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4) •  Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for 
>> the Multilingual
>> Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities (WP3)]
>>
>> Are focusing on "business value". I thought that your presentation 
>> and Phil might do the same ... but I'm not sure if that would work for you?
>> Thoughts from you, Phil or others?
> Thanks for the pointer Felix.
>
> I guess I'm trying to get a sense of the difference between the demos in the morning and those talks in the afternoon. In both cases they seem to be strictly based on the use cases.
>
> So those afternoon presentations would be more an outline of the business aspects of the use cases? Aren't we risking to repeat ourselves a bit between the morning and afternoon session?
>
> Would it make sense to have longer session for each, that would include the business part and then the demo part as an illustration, and have a few the morning and a few the afternoon? That is instead of having case A demo, case B demo, etc. on the morning and then case A business, case B business in the afternoon, to have: case A business + demo in the morning and case B business + demo in the afternoon.
>
> (I'm just thinking aloud... not that we should change anything).

This is a good thought, Yves. I hadn't the repition aspect in mind. 
Let's see what others think - if there is no disagreement I'd then merge the agenda in just "usage scenario" presentations.

Best,

Felix
> -yves
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 20:10:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:08 UTC