W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > September 2012

[All] Prague agenda change proposal

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:49:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL58czozw8qSGmrQo8SZD-zG7PAVWFf2w_kCObMjZJwhMNz+6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi all,

I had a look at the prague agenda again and was worried about the first
slot (which I had created myself in that way, I think :) )
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/PragueSep2012#25_Sept:_MLW-LT_WG_meeting_agenda

The topics
Review state of outstanding data categories and have discussion to resolve
each. ITS 2.0 data categories:

   - mtConfidence
(issue-41<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/41>
   , issue-42<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42>
    / action-195<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/195>
   )
   - disambiguation
(issue-42<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42>
    / action-194<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/194>
   , action-209<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/209>
   , action-210<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/210>
   )
   - provenance
(issue-22<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/22>
   )
   - text analysis annotation
(issue-42<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42>
    / action-194<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/194>
   ).
   - Also to be discussed: readiness
(action-162<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/162>),
   see the proposal<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Sep/0025.html>
   - ITS schemas, see
action-204<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/204>
   - Examples in the spec. see
action-218<https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/218>


are quite specific, so we probably will loose a lot of the people who are
knew or who cannot follow in detail the discussion in the group. So maybe
we should, in this session, put "going through the document in detail" in
the centre, and do some real time editing for the general parts of the doc.
That is, "introduction"
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#introduction
and "basic concepts"
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#basic-concepts

That can also help to bring everybody up to speed, and to take the comments
from Aaron and Dave into account. We would not remove above detailed
topics, but cover them e.g. in "Session 3: Specification editing Sessions &
implementation planning groups". It seems that smaller groups are better
for the discussion anyway.

Thoughts?

Felix

-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 04:49:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:00 UTC