Re: [All] Prague agenda change proposal

Hi Felix,
This sound sensible. There may be some general issues that touch on 
several individual data categories (partial overriding, example 
quality,  wording consistency etc), so if we can resolve those in the 
earlier session, then the people completing the individual data 
categories in group in the later session will know _exactly_ what left 
that they need to resolve.

Could I also remind eveyone to provide some summary of the use case 
demonstrations using the template and link it the the agenda item for 
session 3 and 4 at:
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/PragueSep2012#Agenda

Time will be fairly tight, so having some background details on hand for 
reference will help us make best use of the time.

cheers,
Dave



On 21/09/2012 05:49, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a look at the prague agenda again and was worried about the 
> first slot (which I had created myself in that way, I think :) )
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/PragueSep2012#25_Sept:_MLW-LT_WG_meeting_agenda
>
> The topics
> Review state of outstanding data categories and have discussion to 
> resolve each. ITS 2.0 data categories:
>
>   * mtConfidence (issue-41
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/41>,
>     issue-42
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42> /
>     action-195
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/195>)
>   * disambiguation (issue-42
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42> /
>     action-194
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/194>,
>     action-209
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/209>,
>     action-210
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/210>)
>   * provenance (issue-22
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/22>)
>   * text analysis annotation (issue-42
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/42> /
>     action-194
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/194>).
>   * Also to be discussed: readiness (action-162
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/162>),
>     see the proposal
>     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Sep/0025.html>
>   * ITS schemas, see action-204
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/204>
>   * Examples in the spec. see action-218
>     <https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/218>
>
>
> are quite specific, so we probably will loose a lot of the people who 
> are knew or who cannot follow in detail the discussion in the group. 
> So maybe we should, in this session, put "going through the document 
> in detail" in the centre, and do some real time editing for the 
> general parts of the doc. That is, "introduction"
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#introduction
> and "basic concepts"
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#basic-concepts
>
> That can also help to bring everybody up to speed, and to take the 
> comments from Aaron and Dave into account. We would not remove above 
> detailed topics, but cover them e.g. in "Session 3: Specification 
> editing Sessions & implementation planning groups". It seems that 
> smaller groups are better for the discussion anyway.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Felix
>
> -- 
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>