Re: [All] edits, please review

Felix,

haven't caught up with these latest changes, but some comments on some 
of the older ones - but ignore them if they are not helpful.

- 1.5 out of scope
Yves, Arle and others may have a clearer view on this, but rather than 
just referring to 'Localization parameters' or 'localization 
properties', it would be clearer to refer to 'localization _project_ 
parameters' or 'localization _project_ properties.

- 1.6 important design principles
[minor point] you state "needed for the internationalization and 
localization of XML schemas and documents and HTML5 documents", but 
though schema play a role in the process, we don't literally deal with 
localization of schema (apart from treating an xsd doc as any other xml 
doc). so i suggest dropping the inclusion of schema in this sentence.

[minor wording suggestion] - change; "For ITS markup that appears in an 
XML instance, which XML nodes the ITS-related information pertains to 
must be clearly defined."
to "For ITS markup that appears in an XML instance, *the XML nodes to 
which the ITS-related information pertains must be clearly defined.*"

[minor improvement suggestion] under ease of integration, where you 
discuss fitting into the W3C architecture you could add
"e.g. use of[XPath 1.0] 
<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#xpath>for 
the selection mechanism *and use of IRI's as references to relevant 
external resources*"

5.5 Precedence between selections

for the note about precedence, should this also refer to override of 
global information by local information and of local information by 
local information in a more immediate ancestor? current it just mentions 
'rule elements'

1.1.1 Relationship to ITS1.0

[really minor - to improve clarity] We have the bullet: "Where ITS 1.0 
data categories are implemented in XML, the implementation must be 
conformant with the ITS 1.0 approach to XML to claim conformance to ITS 
2.0."

Though this is factually true, since we now include all the details from 
ITS1.0 in ITS2.0 its perhaps redundant here as a statement about 
conformance. It might then avoid people mistakenly seeking the ITS1.0 
test suite to claim ITS2.0 conformance.

cheers,
Dave





On 12/11/2012 23:12, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did a lot of edits, see
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#changelog-since-20121023
>
> change 6-12.
>
> Tadej, can you esp. review the global rules change? See change 10 and 11.
>
> For all, then you write comments, please use mails with the action 
> item numbers mentioned in the change log.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Felix
>
> -- 
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>