Re: [All] edits, please review

Thanks, Dave, for bringing these up (again). Look all good, I'll try to
implement these on the plane. Still I hope that we will get feedback from
others too, esp. about Disambiguation - here I made most of changes.

- Felix

2012/11/13 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>

>  Felix,
>
> haven't caught up with these latest changes, but some comments on some of
> the older ones - but ignore them if they are not helpful.
>
> - 1.5 out of scope
> Yves, Arle and others may have a clearer view on this, but rather than
> just referring to 'Localization parameters' or 'localization properties',
> it would be clearer to refer to 'localization _project_ parameters' or
> 'localization _project_ properties.
>
> - 1.6 important design principles
> [minor point] you state "needed for the internationalization and
> localization of XML schemas and documents and HTML5 documents", but
> though schema play a role in the process, we don't literally deal with
> localization of schema (apart from treating an xsd doc as any other xml
> doc). so i suggest dropping the inclusion of schema in this sentence.
>
> [minor wording suggestion] - change; "For ITS markup that appears in an
> XML instance, which XML nodes the ITS-related information pertains to must
> be clearly defined."
> to "For ITS markup that appears in an XML instance, *the XML nodes to
> which the ITS-related information pertains must be clearly defined.*"
>
> [minor improvement suggestion] under ease of integration, where you
> discuss fitting into the W3C architecture you could add
> "e.g. use of [XPath 1.0]<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#xpath>
>  for the selection mechanism *and use of IRI's as references to relevant
> external resources*"
>
> 5.5 Precedence between selections
>
> for the note about precedence, should this also refer to override of
> global information by local information and of local information by local
> information in a more immediate ancestor?  current it just mentions 'rule
> elements'
>
> 1.1.1 Relationship to ITS1.0
>
> [really minor - to improve clarity] We have the bullet: "Where ITS 1.0
> data categories are implemented in XML, the implementation must be
> conformant with the ITS 1.0 approach to XML to claim conformance to ITS
> 2.0."
>
> Though this is factually true, since we now include all the details from
> ITS1.0 in ITS2.0 its perhaps redundant here as a statement about
> conformance. It might then avoid people mistakenly seeking the ITS1.0 test
> suite to claim ITS2.0 conformance.
>
> cheers,
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2012 23:12, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I did a lot of edits, see
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#changelog-since-20121023
>
> change 6-12.
>
> Tadej, can you esp. review the global rules change? See change 10 and 11.
>
> For all, then you write comments, please use mails with the action item
> numbers mentioned in the change log.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Felix
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow