W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref

From: Jörg Schütz <joerg@bioloom.de>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 17:22:32 +0100
Message-ID: <50BA2EC8.8040102@bioloom.de>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
What about "its-annotator-ref" or "its:annotarRef" for the ITS annoation?

Cheers -- Jörg

On Dec 01, 2012 at 14:07 (UTC+1), Yves Savourel wrote:
>> Any suggestions?
>
> agentsRef if we change toolsRef
> or agentRef/revAgentRef if we change toolRef/revToolRef
>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 4:33 AM
> To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Subject: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref
>
> Hi all,
>
> while working on
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#list-of-elements-and-attributes
>
> I realized that the provenance "reference to tools" attribute is very similar to the its tool annotation attribute:
>
> - in provenance: its-tool-ref or its:toolRef
> - for ITS annotation: its-tools-ref or its:toolsRef
>
> I think we should rename its-tools-ref (that is the annotation
> mechanism) including the XML counterpart its:toolsRef) to avoid confusion. Since that is a normative change we should get this done on Monday before the call. Any suggestions?
>
> - Felix
>
>
>

-- 
*Prof. Dr. Jörg Schütz* *|* bioloom group *|* Bahnhofstr. 12 *|* D-66424 
Homburg *|* Fon +49-6841-756-338 *|* Mobile +49-170-801-9982 *|* 
joerg.schuetz@bioloom.de

*bioloom group* *|* Vertreten durch / Represented by: Prof. Dr. Jörg 
Schütz *|* Sitz / Register: Homburg *|* USt-IdNr. / Tax-Id.: DE261087278 
*|* Web: www.bioloom.de
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2012 16:22:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC