W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:29:14 +0100
Message-ID: <50BA5A8A.8000302@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Jörg, Phil, Yves, all,

thanks for the feedback. I have changed this now to its:annotatorRef 
(HTML its-annotator-ref). See the diff for the spec, examples and the 
schemas attached. We can discuss this on the Monday call. If possible 
I'd like to make the final change to this before the call, so please 
send feedback before, if needed.

Thanks,

Felix

Am 01.12.12 17:22, schrieb Jörg Schütz:
> What about "its-annotator-ref" or "its:annotarRef" for the ITS annoation?
>
> Cheers -- Jörg
>
> On Dec 01, 2012 at 14:07 (UTC+1), Yves Savourel wrote:
>>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> agentsRef if we change toolsRef
>> or agentRef/revAgentRef if we change toolRef/revToolRef
>>
>> -ys
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 4:33 AM
>> To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
>> Subject: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while working on
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#list-of-elements-and-attributes 
>>
>>
>> I realized that the provenance "reference to tools" attribute is very 
>> similar to the its tool annotation attribute:
>>
>> - in provenance: its-tool-ref or its:toolRef
>> - for ITS annotation: its-tools-ref or its:toolsRef
>>
>> I think we should rename its-tools-ref (that is the annotation
>> mechanism) including the XML counterpart its:toolsRef) to avoid 
>> confusion. Since that is a normative change we should get this done 
>> on Monday before the call. Any suggestions?
>>
>> - Felix
>>
>>
>>
>



Received on Saturday, 1 December 2012 19:29:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC