W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref

From: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 15:44:38 +0000
To: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Message-ID: <233DDE76-0D20-4AB8-8E62-FEBC7CE721DF@vistatec.ie>
Cc: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>

I would propose changing the its annotation to "generatorRef",
"annotatorRef" or "processorRef".

Phil



On 1 Dec 2012, at 13:08, "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

> > Any suggestions?
>
> agentsRef if we change toolsRef
> or agentRef/revAgentRef if we change toolRef/revToolRef
>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 4:33 AM
> To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Subject: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref
>
> Hi all,
>
> while working on
>
>
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#list-of-elements-and-attributes

>
> I realized that the provenance "reference to tools" attribute is very
similar to the its tool annotation attribute:
>
> - in provenance: its-tool-ref or its:toolRef
> - for ITS annotation: its-tools-ref or its:toolsRef
>
> I think we should rename its-tools-ref (that is the annotation
> mechanism) including the XML counterpart its:toolsRef) to avoid
confusion. Since that is a normative change we should get this done on
Monday before the call. Any suggestions?
>
> - Felix
>
>
>


************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.

www.vistatec.com
************************************************************
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2012 15:45:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC