RE: Request for feedback from implemeters (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 1.)

Hi all.

 

The usage of Domain we (Cocomore and I) are doing in the use case of the “CMS to TMS System” is satisfied with global rules, but if there are implementation scenarios where the local approach will be useful or the only way to apply this data category, I would not be against a modification of the ITS 2.0 specification to add this new feature.

I think that the milestones related with the test suite (with the exception of M3 – 31st Jan) would not be affected by adding new test cases for the local Domain usage. We are going to do that already with the new Language Information test case.

 

Cheers.

__________________________________

Mauricio del Olmo Martínez

Dpto. Técnico/I+D+i

Linguaserve Internacionalización de Servicios, S.A.

Tel.: +34 91 761 64 60 ext. 0421
Fax: +34 91 542 89 28 

E-mail:  <mailto:tecnico@linguaserve.com> tecnico@linguaserve.com

www.linguaserve.com <http://www.linguaserve.com/> 

 

«En cumplimiento con lo previsto con los artículos 21 y 22 de la Ley 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de Servicios de la Sociedad de Información y Comercio Electrónico, le informamos que procederemos al archivo y tratamiento de sus datos exclusivamente con fines de promoción de los productos y servicios ofrecidos por LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. En caso de que Vdes. no deseen que procedamos al archivo y tratamiento de los datos proporcionados, o no deseen recibir comunicaciones comerciales sobre los productos y servicios ofrecidos, comuníquenoslo a clients@linguaserve.com, y su petición será inmediatamente cumplida.»

 

"According to the provisions set forth in articles 21 and 22 of Law 34/2002 of July 11 regarding Information Society and eCommerce Services, we will store and use your personal data with the sole purpose of marketing the products and services offered by LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. If you do not wish your personal data to be stored and handled, or you do not wish to receive further information regarding products and services offered by our company, please e-mail us to clients@linguaserve.com. Your request will be processed immediately.”

__________________________________

 

De: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Enviado el: martes, 29 de enero de 2013 17:22
Para: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
CC: Ankit Srivastava; Yves Savourel; tadej.stajner@ijs.si; 'Pablo Nieto Caride'; 'Mauricio del Olmo'; 'Thomas Ruedesheim'; Milan Karasek; Mārcis Pinnis; Philip O'Duffy; Dr. David Filip
Asunto: Request for feedback from implemeters (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 1.)

 

Hi Christian, and domain implementers, put in CC taken from http://tinyurl.com/its20-testsuite-dashboard

at domain implementers: could you please prepare yourself to give an opinion on the proposal of local domain markup on the Wednesday call? If you can't attend, can you please state your opinion in this thread?

Thanks,

Felix 


Am 29.01.13 16:22, schrieb Lieske, Christian:

Hi,

 

One of my comments related to “domain” (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0022.html) was the following:

 

1.       As it stands, "domain" only allows "pointing". Some scenarios may require a "direct encoding" (e.g. via something like its-domain="financials")

 

Jörg summarized the e-mail exchange related to this as follows (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0143.html):

 

==

1. has not been resolved so far. The proposed new feature would allow 

for the direct encoding (either through a string value, or an URI/IRI) 

of domain information. This feature is supported by at least two 

implementers (Pablo and Yves) with their implementation scenarios 

(machine translation application, and ITS/XLIFF mapping -- XLIFF does 

not have a domain concept). Since the ITS 2.0 domain category has 

already been implemented by several (> 5 organizations) including 

appropriate test instances, and given the overall process and time frame 

of ITS 2.0, it is suggested to reject this comment, and to open an RFE 

(ie. new feature/feature extension) for future ITS versions.

==

 

>From my understanding, we were waiting for comments from the implementers (see Felix’ request to them in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0090.html) related to the possibility to implement.

 

Cheers,

Christian