W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2007

RE: ACTION 517 - caching of resources

From: Ruadhan O'Donoghue <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:53:35 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B44835D8@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
Cc: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Thinking about this further, I think it comes down to whether or not we actually need or want to record each instance in MOKI. This is useful information to have, but if ultimately an XSLT test can XPATH to the relevant image instance anyway, then maybe including this information in MOKI is redundant.

How about we keep it simple for now, as Sean suggested, and if we find we need to include this information in MOKI we can revise later?

Ruadhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com]
> Sent: 06 July 2007 10:27
> To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux
> Cc: Ruadhan O'Donoghue; public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ACTION 517 - caching of resources
> 
> Good point. This will be a statement about how that nth occurrence
> appears in the document rather than anything in particular about how
> that nth instance was retrieved. Hence I think we must be able to get
> away with one node describing how foo.gif was retrieved. Yes, indeed,
> you may still want to refer to the nth time it's referenced for the
> reason you give.
> 
> On 7/6/07, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 06 juillet 2007 à 05:10 -0400, Sean Owen a écrit :
> > > I am inclined to 'keep it simple' and go this way. If we want to say
> > > anything about foo.gif, and it's referenced 20 times in a document,
> > > does it help us a lot to point to the first versus nth occurrence of
> > > it?
> >
> > If we want to say that the third instance of foo.gif has wrong
> > dimensions set in the markup while all the others are fine, yes it
> > would.
> >
> > Dom
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 09:55:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT