W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Next F2F meeting: June, London?

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:59:11 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4236DA6@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

> ... just down the road from Victoria Station. Jo can probably
> recommend hotels better than I, but, I enjoyed the Victoria Park
> Plaza: http://www.parkplaza.com/londonuk_victoria

I suppose it's a paradox of sorts, but people who don't live in London
are much better placed to recommend hotels than I am. Sean's
recommendation is extremely close to Google's offices, so fwiw I would
go with that. (It's also quite close to a number of well known London
landmarks e.g. Buckingham Palace, Houses of Parliament, Westminster
Abbey, etc.)

So far as travel arrangements are concerned, if you fly to London
Gatwick LGW there is a direct train to Victoria Station every 15 mins,
journey time 30 mins. 

Jo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen
> Sent: 30 April 2007 22:24
> To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Next F2F meeting: June, London?
> 
> 
> OK, I've tentatively arranged for us to meet at Google London on June
> 12 and 13. There's still time to object if that doesn't work; let's
> finalize this date at the end of the week otherwise.
> 
> Google London is at...
> 
> Belgrave House
> 76 Buckingham Palace Road
> London SW1W 9TQ
> phone: +44 (0)20 7031 3000
> fax: +44 (0)20 7031 3001
> http://local.google.co.uk/local?q=SW1W+9TQ
> 
> ... just down the road from Victoria Station. Jo can probably
> recommend hotels better than I, but, I enjoyed the Victoria Park
> Plaza: http://www.parkplaza.com/londonuk_victoria
> 
> Let's plan to work from 9 to 5, with a break for lunch in our
> sumptuous cafeteria, and an expensed dinner on the night of the 12th.
> Agenda to follow later.
> 
> I don't believe you will need to sign in in the lobby of the building.
> You should also not need to sign any NDA at reception. I will work to
> make sure everyone's aware of this and knows we're coming.
> Tentatively, we are going to be in the "Turing" conference room, for
> what that's worth.
> 
> Sean
> 
> On 4/30/07, Ruadhan O'Donoghue <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> >
> > Sean,
> >
> > Please count me in too!
> >
> > Ruadhan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-mobileok-
> > > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen
> > > Sent: 30 April 2007 12:24
> > > To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: Next F2F meeting: June, London?
> > >
> > >
> > > June 12th / 13th -- going once, going twice. Kai any reason to
think
> > > that would *not* work for the mobileOK Pro committee?
> > >
> > > Can I get a rough head count? There is me and Jo. There is, I
hope, at
> > > least one and hopefully two of our friends from Spain. Add one
more to
> > > be safe -- plan for 5? If Kai & company join us, I imagine that
goes
> > > to 8?
> > >
> > > I'll go ahead and provisionally make some arrangements, but, let's
not
> > > set this in stone until it's clear we'll have enough attendance.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 4/29/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > > > That still works well for me.
> > > >
> > > > Jo
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com]
> > > > > Sent: 28 April 2007 23:32
> > > > > To: Jo Rabin; Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
> > > > > Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Next F2F meeting: June, London?
> > > > >
> > > > > More on this. Looks like we're OK to host in Google London. Is
the
> > > > > 12th and 13th about right for everyone? Kai I hear that you
are
> > trying
> > > > > to arrange a mobileOK Pro F2F as well. Would this time suit
you? I
> > > > > think we can combine the two -- just looking for a rough head
> > count
> > > > > and whether that date is OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> >
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 21:59:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT