- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:41:44 -0400
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: stephengreenubl@gmail.com, public-microxml@w3.org
David Carlisle scripsit: > I don't think that will happen. The HTML5 designers explicitly rejected > (multiple times) the notion that /> syntax should mean empty element. It's not valid in HTML5 to write a void element as a start-tag/end-tag pair. It is likewise not valid to write a non-void element with an empty-tag. -- And it was said that ever after, if any John Cowan man looked in that Stone, unless he had a cowan@ccil.org great strength of will to turn it to other http://ccil.org/~cowan purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering in flame. --"The Pyre of Denethor"
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 02:42:05 UTC