W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > October 2012

Re: thoughts on next steps

From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:55:41 -0400
To: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
Message-ID: <20121003065541.GE23095@mercury.ccil.org>
James Fuller scripsit:

> * I maybe wrong, but I don't think the recent publication communicated
> to the world at large that we are seeking public review … we should
> reinforce this message

I agree.

> I think the spec is remarkably brief, concise and from a personal
> point of view cohesive (at least for my purposes) … and I note this
> single document replaces a number of other docs (wondering what the
> page count ratio is) 

MicroXML: 7 pages
JSON RFC: 10 pages
XML Rec (5th Edition): 30 pages + XML Infoset: 14 pages = 43 pages

> I will start writing up some tutorial around the parsers i've created.

Excellent.  I'm going back to working on MicroLark.

Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           cowan@ccil.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 06:56:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:11 UTC