- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:55:45 +0200
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
Hello All, JohnC's Road Ahead email thread sparked off a few observations; * I maybe wrong, but I don't think the recent publication communicated to the world at large that we are seeking public review … we should reinforce this message * I echo calls that the next step could be comparisons in terms of parsing performance, this type of thing is always good material that gets attention * I also believe the next steps is to 'use microxml' … generate some tutorial material with a focus on javascript parsers (of which we now have 2) I think the spec is remarkably brief, concise and from a personal point of view cohesive (at least for my purposes) … and I note this single document replaces a number of other docs (wondering what the page count ratio is) so I would internally declare victory, as for doing more stuff its interesting but I think our energies should, at least briefly, be focused on generating some supporting material that will assist ppl to understand microxml, use it and gain benefit from it. I will start writing up some tutorial around the parsers i've created. Jim Fuller
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 05:56:12 UTC