- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:43:31 -0500
- To: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, public-microxml@w3.org
Stephen D Green scripsit: > I reckon giving consent to the WG to take the spec further should > be *in parallel* to this CG pushing it as far towards standardisation > as possible. After all, the WG might not actually want to take it further > - just have agreement from us that they MAY do so. That doesn't > mean the CG stops trying to take it further themselves (too?), does it? No. But if the WG actually accepts MicroXML as a work item, and we agree to hand it off, then we'd have to stop working on it. It serves no one for there to be two evolving MicroXML specs, the CG flavor and the WG flavor. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup, James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 15:43:57 UTC