W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Error recovery

From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:18:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CAA0AChVNuDbPbnvmThKk0QQ+HikepvKsX2T=h3oD-9EibnOj9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, public-microxml@w3.org
Regarding specification  style: How about the error handling spec being
maintained as a "living standard"?
----
Stephen D Green



On 19 November 2012 08:23, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
>
>> On 17.11.2012 3:53, James Clark wrote:
>> > I have been writing a parser that does error recovery.
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> is your error recovery based on XML-ER
>> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xml-er/raw-file/tip/Overview.html) or are you
>> thinking about different approach?
>>
>
> Different.
>
> - I believe the architecture should make it possible to use schema
> information if it is available
>  - I believe error handling for (Micro)XML should be carefully designed,
> rather than copied from HTML5
> - Not streaming. I think streaming prevents adequate handling of cases
> where the input does not consist of a single element.
> - Different style of specification (I don't like the WHATWG style)
>
> James
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 11:19:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 November 2012 11:19:18 GMT