- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:48:30 +0100
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
On 26/07/2012 12:39, Andrew Welch wrote: > I see it more for the masses currently struggling with full xml, > where a simplified subset will mean simplified apis, and fewer/zero > gotchas. Well agreed with that but by > Presumably the point of microxml is to make it easy for people not > currently using xml to do so. I meant that if you are looking for places where people struggle with XML then discarding a use case because "people rarely do that" seems odd. It may be that people don't do it often at present because it is harder than it should be. It was a comment on Dave's response rather than anything specific to the particular issue. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 11:48:58 UTC