- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:39:28 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
> Presumably the point of microxml is to make it easy for people not > currently using xml to do so. If we only look for microxml uses where > people commonly already use full xml, there is little point in a subset. Isn't that trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist? I see it more for the masses currently struggling with full xml, where a simplified subset will mean simplified apis, and fewer/zero gotchas. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 11:39:58 UTC