W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2010

minutes of 2010-09-15 teleconference

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:29:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4C987B17.4040905@eurecom.fr>
To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all,

The minutes of last week telecon were not yet sent to the mailing list. 
There are available for review at
http://www.w3.org/2010/09/15-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format
below).
Cheers.

   RaphaŽl

-----------
    [1]W3C
       [1] http://www.w3.org/
              Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference
15 Sep 2010
    [2]Agenda
       [2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Sep/0041.html
    See also: [3]IRC log
       [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/15-mediafrag-irc
Attendees
    Present
           Yves, jackjansen, +329331aaaa, Davy
    Regrets
           Erik, Raphael, Silvia, Philip
    Chair
           Yves
    Scribe
           Yves
Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]Admin
          2. [6]Media Fragment extension
          3. [7]public comment
          4. [8]Addressing
          5. [9]RTSP
          6. [10]test cases
          7. [11]AOB
      * [12]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

    <trackbot> Date: 15 September 2010

Admin

    approval of [13]http://www.w3.org/2010/09/08-mediafrag-minutes.html

      [13] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/08-mediafrag-minutes.html

    <davy> +1

    RESOLUTION: minutes approved

    ACTION-183: Raphael to send review reminders to all relevant groups

    (until end of Sept)

    <trackbot> ACTION-183 Send reminders to all relevant groups notes
    added

    still pending

Media Fragment extension

    Jack to investigate what happenned to issue 181

public comment

    [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Ju
    n/0099.html

      [14] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0099.html

    Yves: ignoring what you don't understand (like unknown range units)
    is not an implementation default, it is how it works in HTTP

Addressing

    [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Ma
    y/0061.html

      [15] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010May/0061.html

    no thread on the ML on that topic :/

    [16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Ju
    l/0010.html

      [16] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jul/0010.html

    Jack: all my input in the ML thread on that
    ... we should make sure that europeana people can extend our spec,
    and let them experiment

    Yves: in their current proposal, there might be security
    implication, and it is also more fragile that it should be (because
    of the URI put in the fragment

RTSP

    Davy: Silvia made good improvements, need to discuss some issues
    especially redirects

test cases

    <scribe> => no progress

    <scribe> Scribe: Yves

AOB

    possible regrets for Jack & Davy

    ADJOURNED

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 09:32:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:39 GMT