2010/3/9 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>: >> The argument is as follows: >> >> 1. we have to use semicolon in the HTTP header, since comma has a >> different meaning there. > > I have followed this thread of discussion but I'm not sure I agree with this > conclusion. That was Yves' argument. Has that changed? >> 2. we might as well be consistent in both, URL and HTTP header with >> our separators. > > We are already not consistent between URL and HTTP header for the time > dimension. We use ',' in the URL and '-' in the headers, since we prefer to > follow the bytes pattern. Yes, it was unavoidable there, but this is a different dimension and if we can avoid it, we should. The less parsing changes necessary, the better. Cheers, Silvia.Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 01:47:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT