> The argument is as follows: > > 1. we have to use semicolon in the HTTP header, since comma has a > different meaning there. I have followed this thread of discussion but I'm not sure I agree with this conclusion. > 2. we might as well be consistent in both, URL and HTTP header with > our separators. We are already not consistent between URL and HTTP header for the time dimension. We use ',' in the URL and '-' in the headers, since we prefer to follow the bytes pattern. > 3. therefore use of semicolon is preferred in URL over use of comma Therefore I'm not sure this conclusion still holds :-) Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 01:13:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT