W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > March 2009

Re: ABNF for fragment syntax

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:58:06 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02830903031558y70f758eem14ed7e777593b1d5@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, public-media-fragment@w3.org, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:15 AM, RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl> wrote:
>>> Also, didn't we predefine things like track=audio at some point, or did
>>> we drop that (and have I forgotten about it)?
>>
>> That is really a sub-part more than a fragment, we might address it for
>> the identification of just the audio part (see discussion about changing
>> mime type for fragment/full sub-resources), but I don't remember if we just
>> forgot, or if we dropped. Do someone remember?
>
> I remember we agreed to not predefine any track name, since we couldn't find
> in the existing container format a coherent naming scheme for the audio,
> video, etc. Davy, can you confirm?

track=audio doesn't make much sense. What if there are multiple audio
tracks? They all need to be named by the container format, so there
are no default names.

Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 23:58:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT