W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2009

Re: ABNF for fragment syntax

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:17:07 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02830902261517g3fe6cfa6i361a094b6a278154@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Awesome idea.

So we currently have:
* mediafragment
* segment
* extract
* subpart

any further ideas?

Cheers,
Silvia.


On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> By its sheer name, 'mediafragment' too obviously just addresses the
>> 'fragment' and not the 'query' part of the URI. Maybe we can think of
>> something better. That's why I suggested 'segment'. We could also use
>> 'extract' or 'subpart' - something that incorporates the extraction of
>> a thumbnail from a video as well as the creation of a video extract.
>
> Let's gather proposals and start a poll :)
>
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>
>        ~~Yves
>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 23:17:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT